Margots Intentional Killing in Hemingways The Short...

Ernest Hemingway is known for writing novels and short stories with unresolved endings. In his short story, ?The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber?, he definitely leaves his readers guessing. The question is whether Margot kills her husband, Francis, intentionally, or if she accidentally shoots him, because she tries to save his life. There are many points that could be argued for both conclusions, but my observations have led me to believe that Margot did indeed shoot her husband intentionally, however, without pre-meditation. Margot has one of the most obvious motivations to kill her husband: money. In addition, she, on the other hand, has one great asset, her beauty, ?They had a sound basis of union. Margot was too beautiful†¦show more content†¦Francis reveals his lack of self-confidence and control over the situation. ?If he had been better with women she would probably have started to worry about him getting another new, beautiful wife but she knew too much about him to worry? (Hemingway). His lack of self-confidence has given her all the power in the relationship and it was a major contributing factor in her infidelity. Later on in the story, the growth of Francis?s confidence during the buffalo hunt and Margot?s displeasure with it is the final clue in determination of the death of Francis Macomber. The buffalo hunt gives Francis a new found sense of ?happiness?. This ?new wealth? of confidence is powerful for Francis and devastating for Margot . ?Fear gone like an operation. Something els e grew in its place. Main thing a man had. Made him into man. Women knew it too. No bloody fear? (Hemingway). Margot knew at this point that if Francis survives the trip, he might possess enough personal strength and finally leave her, and that is what encourages her decision to kill him. At the end of the story Wilson confirms the reader?s suspicion when he reacts to the shooting by saying to Margot, ?That was a pretty thing to do? (Hemindway). That statement reinforces the belief that Margot was indeed taking advantage of the opportunity to ensure her long-term wealth and eliminate the possibility of being

The Simple Gift and A Child Called IT Free Essays

The desire to belong to people or a place is important to individuals as it helps them develop a sense of security and identity. This statement can be seen throughout various texts but is undoubtedly shown through the texts ‘The Simple Gift’ and ‘A Child Called IT’. The free verse novel ‘The Simple Gift’ is about Billy Luckett, a sixteen-year-old boy who decides to leave home, as he felt he was isolated from everyone else. We will write a custom essay sample on The Simple Gift and A Child Called IT or any similar topic only for you Order Now Billy finds his security, peace and identity in the natural environment but is also shown throughout the novel that he does not give up to be a part of something or someone as he continues to strive to see the good side to others. In the novel Herrick constantly uses a various array of techniques such as symbolism, flashback and first person to portray the character’s feelings. Billy â€Å"praying for morning and sunshine† gives a sign to the reader that he desires a new life, and the symbolism of the morning and sunshine signify a new day. The wind and the rain â€Å"hitting Billy in the face with the force of a father’s punch† also help to expose the mistreatment that his father had given him whilst being at home. Through these quotes it is patent that Herrick employs the techniques symbolism and flash back to show how he is not accepted by his father. When Billy finally finds his place he can call home, Bendarat, here he also discovers his first real companionship from Old Bill, the â€Å"saddest man in the world†, and Caitlin, a girl he meets at McDonald’s who is from a wealthy family. To begin Billy is presented to the, at times, judgmental Caitlin as a bum but by displaying his compassion and not only being a homeless boy on the street he changes her perspective on himself, Old Bill and people like him. When we first see Caitlin, Herrick employs first person and the change in perspective to show Caitlin’s first reaction to Billy eating scraps at McDonalds – â€Å"put that back. † However, Caitlin avoids this, and instead says, â€Å"I hate mopping† to show Billy’s already changing influence on Caitlin. Billy, ironically, acts as a role model for Old Bill, as he transforms him by giving him â€Å"simple gifts† such as coffee, breakfast and the cigarettes. Here is shown once again the compassion given off by Billy as he does not give up on a person who tells him to â€Å"piss off son†. In becoming closer with Old Bill we are aware why he is such an old bitter man: the loss of his wife and his â€Å"darling Jessie†. It is also seen how Billy influences Old Bill to change his ways; prompting him to shave, this symbolises his own personal growth. In return Old Bill repays Billy by giving him his old house to live in. The use of first person in these quotes give a deeper explanation on to how one character has ended up where he is. All these examples illustrate how Billy’s desire to belong to a place or people helped him find that security and identity. As Old Bill presents him the gift of the key to his home this gives the sense of protection as he now has his own place to live and be himself with no violence from his father. His relationship with Caitlin also shows how she has accepted him for who he is and provides each of them with a sense of identity. The text ‘A Child Called IT’ also connects and relates to the previous text. This is portrayed through the main character, David. The first chapter ironically begins with the ending to give emphasis to the reader and demonstrate the importance of the ending for the child. Various techniques are used within the text such as first person narration and personification. As the novel is spoken in first person, its effectiveness is shown as it highlights to the reader that the story is from the child’s perspective, which is also shown in ‘The Simple Gift’ with the difference that it comes from more than one characters’ standpoint. It symbolizes that the author is directly addressing the reader to have a greater impact and engages them to continue reading. Throughout his childhood David becomes an isolated victim of his mother’s violence in comparison to how Billy is a victim to his fathers violence, which in turn makes him abandon his home and run away. David is rejected by his family members and is represented as the household slave as well as being his mothers outlet for anger. The idea of isolation is conveyed throughout the novel and it becomes evident that, not only at home, but also at school David is removed from normal relationships. The entire room lets out a howl at me – the reject of the fifth grade†, this example uses the mentioned technique of personification to emphasise to the reader that David is completely segregated, lost and alone. He does not belong at home with his own family, nor does he at school among his peers. Disconnection and alienation is presented throughout the novel, while David has accepted the fact that he does not belong to anyone or anything he still desires that someday he will be capable to connect with something or someone. This is evident in the line, â€Å"I would give anything to have been there in class when they found out I’m not so bad†. The quote has impact on the reader as it identifies that, although his peers have seemed nothing but uninterested in becoming friend with him, he still longs and strives to be accepted so that he may have that sense of belonging to a place or to people. Therefore, through these examples, it can be said that the text ‘A Child Called IT’ helps develop our understanding of the fundamental human need to belong by intensely drawing the reader’s attention to a deep sense of not belonging ad also how important it is to develop a connection with people or a place. How to cite The Simple Gift and A Child Called IT, Essay examples

Article Analysis Marker of Brand Communities

Question: Discuss about theArticle Analysisfor Marker of Brand Communities. Answer: Introduction Marketing and Brand Management has seen several changes over the years. In this era of globalization and digitization, few of the most widely used marketing and brand management concepts are relationship marketing, social media marketing, brand equity etc. It is rightly said that the veneration of brands as part of brand communities reflects the expansion of consumerism in advanced capitalism (Stratton Northcote, 2014). Simply defined, A brand community can be defined as an enduring self-selected group of actors sharing a system of values, standards and representations (a culture) and recognizing bonds of membership with each other and with the whole. The objective of this paper is to discuss and analyse the paper, When totems beget clans: The brand symbol as the defining marker of brand communities. This paper would discuss the paper and its implications for brand managers. The paper would also discuss the lessons learned from this paper. Analysis The paper is about brand community and the way brand managers can use the concepts of brand community to reach out to end consumers. There was a time when corporations and brand managers used to manage the operations in a small territory or domestic market (Laroche Habibi, 2012). However, with Internet, technology and advancements in the corporations, the brand managers have started to explore the international market. There is also a change in the overall definition of marketing. In fact, the brand managers have seen a transformation from the traditional selling concept to marketing concepts. With the concepts like brand community, brand identity and brand equity, the focus of the brand managers is to change the PUSH marketing philosophy to PULL marketing philosophy. In the article, authors mentioned that there are significant differences between the brand community and other forms of community (Stratton Northcote, 2014). It is important for leaders, brand managers and marketers to understand this difference between brand community and other forms of community. It is argued that brand communities differ from other types of communities in one important respect the community is a secondary, rather than primary, effect of brand community association. It means that brand is a symbol before its get its space in brand community. In other communities, the symbol is the after affect or the aftermath of the work being done (Kuo Feng, 2013). Authors also argued that brand communities have unique dynamics that are typically not observed in the communities. The concept of brand community is still a new concept and it is expected that this concept would further evolve in the coming time. The marketers of various brands have a lot to learn from these concepts. One of major learning from this article is that different brands can have different brand communities. For example, the brand communities for Unilever may not be same as the brand communities for Southwest Airlines (Shaomian Heere, 2015). It is also important to mention that a big corporation can also have different brand communities for its different products. For example, Unilever may have a different brand community for its soap product and different brand community for its tea product. Therefore, it is important to mention that marketers should think twice before selecting their brand community. Another important discussion or the learning is in the way brand communities are developed. In the article, authors argued that the brand managers or the marketers may not always have the direct control over the way brand communities are developed (Stratton Northcote, 2014). There are times when the brand communities are build or developed as the people spread the news about the brand. Therefore, it would be correct to say that the people or the consumers have a great impact over brand communities. In the article, authors referred the brand identity or the brand symbol as the maker of brand community. Authors argued that in various case, the brand symbol could be considered as a totem that acts as a sign board for the brand (Stratton Northcote, 2014). It would be correct to say that the brand symbol or brand identity is of utmost importance for corporations. The entire marketing effort of organizations can go in vain if the brand is not able to establish its reputation in the market. In fact, this is one of the reasons that it is recommended that the marketing mix of the product should be in synchronization with the overall brand message. Every element of marketing mix (product, price, place and promotion) conveys a message and it is important that these messages should be in line with the overall message being communicated by the brand. The brand may not be a tangible thing like a product. However, the brand identity or the brand positioning can have a high impact on the sale of products. It would be correct to say that for organizations, brand identity or brand community should come first and then it should be followed by the core principles of marketing like segmentation, targeting, positioning and marketing mix (Brodie Juric, 2013). In fact, the marketing strategies of the organizations would depend on number of internal and external factors. The internal factors can be managed by the organization. However, the external factors like political, social, economical, legal, technological, etc. are not under the direct control of organizations (Zhang Zhou, 2013). Conclusion The above paper discusses the article When totems beget clans: The brand symbol as the defining marker of brand communities. With the above discussion, it can be said that the organizations should have a proactive approach towards marketing and brand management. The brand community could only be a step towards the effective marketing strategies of organizations. It is important that the organizations should keep a watch while the brand communities are being developed. The brand communities are typically based on the brand symbol and therefore, it is crucial that the brand communities should echo the brand promise. References Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105-114. Kuo, Y. F., Feng, L. H. (2013). Relationships among community interaction characteristics, perceived benefits, community commitment, and oppositional brand loyalty in online brand communities. International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 948-962. Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M. O., Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755-1767. Shaomian, A., Heere, B. (2015). The Path to Loyalty Among Theater Patrons: The Importance of Interaction and a Sense of Brand Community. MEIEA Journal, 15(1), 13. Stratton, G., Northcote, J. (2014). When totems beget clans: The brand symbol as the defining marker of brand communities.Journal of Consumer Culture Zhang, N., Zhou, Z. M., Su, C. T., Zhou, N. (2013). How do different types of community commitment influence brand commitment? The mediation of brand attachment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 836-842.